The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7861•Joseph Michael Ladeairous v. EDDIE PEARSON, Warden of Sussex I Correctional Center
13-7861Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 28, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7861
JOSEPH MICHAEL LADEAIROUS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDDIE PEARSON, Warden of Sussex I Correctional Center,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00307-JAG)
Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 28, 2014
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Michael Ladeairous, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth
Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Michael Ladeairous appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) for failure to state a claim.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Ladeairous v. Pearson, No. 3:12-cv-00307-JAG (E.D. Va.
Nov. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.