The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7834•United States of America v. Gerald A. Hinds
13-7834Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 27, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7834
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
GERALD A. HINDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:00-cr-00319-JRS-1)
Submitted: March 24, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2014
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald A. Hinds, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill,
Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Hinds appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for a reduction of his sentence. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Hinds, No. 3:00-cr-00319-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. filed
Sept. 5, 2013 & entered Sept. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.