The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7814•United States of America v. Carl Eric Hopkins
13-7814Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 11, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7814
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CARL ERIC HOPKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:02-cr-00540-JFA-1)
Submitted: April 11, 2014 Decided: September 11, 2014
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Eric Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carl Eric Hopkins appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.
Crim. P. 35(b) motion for reduction of sentence. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Hopkins, No. 3:02-cr-00540-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 8,
2013). We deny Hopkins' motion to appoint/assign counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.