The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7805•Allen Wayne Poston v. KANE, Director
13-7805Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 10, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7805
ALLEN WAYNE POSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KANE, Director; TRACY JONES, Warden; ERIC WILSON, Warden;
SHAH, Dr.; KATHERIN LAYBOURN, Dr.; APONT’E, Ms., AHSA;
FLOWERS, Ms; Nurse; LUIS NEGRON, MLP; MACK BONNER, JR.; Dr.;
NIKI CANADA, Nurse; VIVIAN K. HARRIS, Camp Admin.; BARBARA
HAYWOOD, CSW; A. FORTE, Counselor; HOBGOOD, Mr.; Work
super.; MARTIN, Mr.; Work super.; TUDOR, Mr.; Unit mgr.;
WILLIAMS, Ms.; Unit mgr.; HERTLIE JARRATT, Ms.; CSW; MARROW,
Ms.; Counselor; HOLLAND, Ms.; Counselor; ANGELA TOMLINSON,
Ms.; Unit mgr.; SMITH, Ms.; Camp Admin.; ABIMEAL, Mr.; MLP;
C. EICHENLAUB, Regional Dir.; NEWBILL, Mr.; Counselor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00365-JCC-IDD)
Submitted: August 29, 2014 Decided: September 10, 2014
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allen Wayne Poston, Appellant Pro Se.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Allen Wayne Poston appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) motion seeking relief from
the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens* action for
failure to particularize and to state a claim. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Poston v. Kane,
No. 1:13-cv-00365-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 22, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.