The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7783•Charles Gillenwater v. Frank L. Cikutovich
13-7783Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 21, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7783
CHARLES GILLENWATER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FRANK L. CIKUTOVICH,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03135-BO)
Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 21, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Gillenwater, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Gillenwater appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) his
complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have
reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Gillenwater v. Cikutovich, No. 5:13-ct-03135-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct.
23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.