The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7778•United States of America v. Edwin Lloyd Murray, a/k/a Gator
13-7778Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7778
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EDWIN LLOYD MURRAY, a/k/a Gator,
Plaintiff - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District
Judge. (1:03-cr-00309-MJG-2)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edwin Lloyd Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke,
Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edwin Lloyd Murray appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for a sentence reduction filed pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion.
See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004)
(motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the
district court”). Thus, we affirm the district court’s order.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.