The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7766•United States of America v. Kareem Jamal Currence
13-7766Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 27, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7766
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:05-cr-00231-JRS-1)
Submitted: March 25, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2014
Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kareem Jamal Currence, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kareem Jamal Currence appeals the district court’s
order denying his self-styled Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Currence, No. 3:05-cr-00231-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 11,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.