The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7699•Charles Robert Morris, Iii v. OFFICER TURNER, Correction Officer
13-7699Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7699
CHARLES ROBERT MORRIS, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER TURNER, Correction Officer; OFFICER KOLB, Correction
Officer; JOSEPH A. HIGGS, JR., Superintendent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01030-LO-JFA)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Robert Morris, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Robert Morris, III, appeals the district
court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Morris v. Officer Turner, No. 1:13-cv-
01030-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 2, 2013; entered Oct. 3,
2013). We deny Morris’s motions for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.