The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7625•United States of America v. Everett Cornelius Kaymore, a/k/a CO, a/k/a Everet Cornelius Kaymore
13-7625Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7625
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EVERETT CORNELIUS KAYMORE, a/k/a CO, a/k/a Everet Cornelius
Kaymore,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson,
District Judge. (5:10-cr-00016-SGW-RSB-1)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Everett Cornelius Kaymore, Appellant Pro Se. Jeb Thomas
Terrien, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Everett Cornelius Kaymore appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s previous
denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a
sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233,
235-36 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting that a district court does not
have authority to reconsider prior order on § 3582 motion).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.