The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7587•Lord Versatile v. LORETTA KELLY, Warden (Former), Sussex I State Prison
13-7587Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7587
LORD VERSATILE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA KELLY, Warden (Former), Sussex I State Prison; A. F.
MILLER, Operations Officer, Warden - Designee, Sussex I
State Prison; R. W. SPROUSE, CO, Investigator, Sussex I
State Prison; W. BROWN, Hearings Officer, Sussex I State
Prison,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:12-cv-00333-HEH)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lord Versatile, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lord Versatile, a Virginia inmate, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Versatile v. Kelly, No. 3:12-cv-00333-
HEH (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.