The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7582•Terence Linwood Lockett, Sr. v. Earnest Toney; Wesley Reed; James Ennis
13-7582Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 26, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7582
TERENCE LINWOOD LOCKETT, SR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
EARNEST TONEY; WESLEY REED; JAMES ENNIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00209-JAG)
Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 26, 2013
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terence Linwood Lockett, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Terence Linwood Lockett, Sr., appeals the district
court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action
without prejudice for failing to pay the initial partial filing
fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Lockett v. Toney, No. 3:13-cv-00209-JAG (E.D. Va.
Sept. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.