The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7526•James Davis v. Corizon Medical Services, f/k/a Correctional Medical Services
13-7526Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7526
JAMES DAVIS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, f/k/a Correctional Medical
Services; WARDEN KATHLEEN GREEN; TERRI PILCHER; LIEUTENANT
SOUKUP; OFFICER FRITZ; BRUCE FORD; LYNNE COLE; JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-02051-JKB)
Submitted: February 25, 2014 Decided: March 4, 2014
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon E. Conners, Michelle
Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY,
P.C., Towson, Maryland; Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant
Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Davis appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Davis v. Corizon Med. Servs, No. 1:12-cv-02051-JKB (D. Md. filed
Aug. 22, 2013 & entered Aug. 23, 2013). We deny Davis’ motion
to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.