The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7481•United States of America v. Adrian Lamont Benniefield, a/k/a Adrian Benniefield
13-7481Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 26, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7481
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ADRIAN LAMONT BENNIEFIELD, a/k/a Adrian Benniefield,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:09-cr-00055-HEH-1)
Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 26, 2013
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrian Lamont Benniefield, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles
Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adrian Lamont Benniefield appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Benniefield,
No. 3:09-cr-00055-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.