The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7453•Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad v. Russell A. Purdue
13-7453Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7453
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
RUSSELL A. PURDUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00129-FPS-JSK)
Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 24, 2014
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell
Altmeyer, Jarod James Douglas, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, a federal prisoner,
appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Muhammad v. Purdue, No. 5:12-cv-00129-
FPS-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.