The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7391•Marshall Fontana Wiggs v. BUCK WILSON, Public Health Director
13-7391Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 23, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7391
MARSHALL FONTANA WIGGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BUCK WILSON, Public Health Director; DR. MUHAMMAD WASI HAQ;
ROBERT HARDY; ARCHIE MALLOY, Head of Cumberland County
Detention Center Medical Staff; EARL BUTLER, Sheriff; JOHN
MCRAINEY, Major; LIEUTENANT IVY; PATRICIA PURNELL, Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03188-BO)
Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marshall Fontana Wiggs, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Ruth Holbrook,
BROWN LAW, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ronnie Monroe Mitchell,
MITCHELL LAW GROUP, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marshall Fontana Wiggs appeals the district court’s
orders denying Wiggs’ motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) complaint to add two new defendants and granting
Defendants summary judgment in Wiggs’ § 1983 action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Wiggs v. Wilson, No. 5:11-ct-03188-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2013 &
Aug. 16, 2013). We deny Wiggs’ motion for the appointment of
counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.