The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7296•United States of America v. Robert Everton Rushie
13-7296Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7296
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERT EVERTON RUSHIE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:00-cr-00396-NCT-1)
Submitted: October 7, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Everton Rushie, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Everton Rushie appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motions for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Rushie, No. 1:00-cr-
00396-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. May 30, 2013). We deny Rushie’s motion to
appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.