Carroll Gaylord v. MICHAEL J. STOUFFER, Commissioner

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7274
CARROLL GAYLORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. STOUFFER, Commissioner; CORIZON, INC., f/k/a
C.M.S., Medical Care Provider; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden,
N.B.C.I.; MD COLIN OTTEY, Dr., N.B.C.I.; GREGG FLURY, P.A.,
N.B.C.I.; D. ADAMS, Head Nurse; MONICA METHENY, RN; STEVEN
BRAY, RN; AUTUMN DURST, RN; TIMBELIE ADAMS, RN; WILLIAM
BEEMAN, RN; BREANNA BROWN, RN, N.B.C.I.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:12-cv-02477-DKC)
Submitted: December 20, 2013 Decided: January 15, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carroll Gaylord, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Patricia H.
Beall, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Carroll Gaylord appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment to Defendants on his claims of
deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs under 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), and denying his motion filed pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Gaylord v. Stouffer, No. 8:12-cv-02477-
DKC (D. Md. June 12, 2013; July 11, 2013). We deny Gaylord’s
motions to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --