The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7243•Jimmy Dean Jones, a/k/a Jimmy D. Jones v. Gary Lane; Corporal Betty Rodgers; Lieutenant Lawrence Levigne; Investigator Donald Lane
13-7243Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7243
JIMMY DEAN JONES, a/k/a Jimmy D. Jones,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GARY LANE; CORPORAL BETTY RODGERS; LIEUTENANT LAWRENCE
LEVIGNE; INVESTIGATOR DONALD LANE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
TIM RILEY, Warden; TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et
al.; LAURA CALDWELL; MRS. NANCY BYRD; DISCIPLINARY HEARING
OFFICER R.L. TURNER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-01033-JMC)
Submitted: November 19, 2013 Decided: November 22, 2013
Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Jimmy D. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Holmes Burton,
GIBBES & BURTON, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Dean Jones appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice Jones’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Jones v. Lane, No. 1:12-cv-01033-JMC (D.S.C. June 26,
2013). We grant Jones’ motion to file a supplemental informal
reply brief and deny his motion for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.