The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7157•United States of America v. Darryl Mayes Proctor
13-7157Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 8, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7157
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DARRYL MAYES PROCTOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District
Judge. (7:07-cr-00711-TMC-1)
Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: January 8, 2014
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Mayes Proctor, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Elizabeth
Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Mayes Proctor appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a sentence reduction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Proctor, No. 7:07-cr-00711-TMC-1 (D.S.C. June 13,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.