The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7150•Eugene Jerome Cunningham v. DARLENE DREW, Warden - FCI Bennettsville
13-7150Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 29, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7150
EUGENE JEROME CUNNINGHAM,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DARLENE DREW, Warden – FCI Bennettsville,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (9:11-cv-03179-CMC)
Submitted: January 22, 2014 Decided: January 29, 2014
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Jerome Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier
Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Jerome Cunningham appeals from the district
court’s order denying his motion to void its earlier judgment
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. See Wendt v. Leonard, 431 F.3d 410,
412-13 (4th Cir. 2005) (providing standard in Rule 60(b)(4)
action). Accordingly, we affirm the challenged order. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.