The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7149•Anthony Jo-Allen McCoy v. B. ULEP, Doctor, Sussex I State Prison
13-7149Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 26, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7149
ANTHONY JO-ALLEN MCCOY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
B. ULEP, Doctor, Sussex I State Prison,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:12-cv-00883-JRS)
Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 26, 2013
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Jo-Allen McCoy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Jo-Allen McCoy appeals the district court’s
order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
action for noncompliance with a court order. A plaintiff’s
failure to comply with an order of the court may warrant
involuntary dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We review a
district court’s dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse of
discretion. Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95-96 (4th Cir.
1989). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See McCoy v. Ulep, No. 3:12-cv-00883-JRS (E.D.
Va. July 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.