The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7119•United States of America v. Andre Ricardo Davis, a/k/a Bones
13-7119Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 27, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7119
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDRE RICARDO DAVIS, a/k/a Bones,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior
District Judge. (6:99-cr-70054-NKM-4)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 27, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Ricardo Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel P. Bubar, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andre Ricardo Davis appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence
reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
United States v. Davis, 6:99-cr-70054-NKM-4 (W.D. Va. June 25,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.