United States of America v. Harold Fields

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7080
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HAROLD FIELDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (2:89-cr-00251-JAB-1)
Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 25, 2013
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Harold Fields appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.∗ United States v. Fields, No. 2:89-cr-00251-JAB-
1 (M.D.N.C. July 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ We further note that 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is not the
appropriate mechanism to assert the retroactive application of
Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013).

-- 2 of 2 --