The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7071•United States of America v. Mark Wright
13-7071Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7071
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARK WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (4:11-cr-00078-TLW-9)
Submitted: October 21, 2013 Decided: October 25, 2013
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark Wright appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for specific performance to compel the Government to
file a motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States
v. Wright, No. 4:11-cr-00078-TLW-9 (D.S.C. May 10, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.