The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7053•Steven Louis Barnes v. Gregory William Seigler; Lt. Mark Howard
13-7053Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 30, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7053
STEVEN LOUIS BARNES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GREGORY WILLIAM SEIGLER; LT. MARK HOWARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-cv-01156-MBS)
Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson,
II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Louis Barnes appeals the district court’s
orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice Barnes’ claims against Appellee
Gregory William Seigler and granting summary judgment on Barnes’
claims against Appellee Mark Howard in favor of Howard, and
denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Barnes v. Seigler, No.
5:11-cv-01156-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2012; June 6, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.