United States of America v. Lamatavous Regtez Collins, a/k/a Red

13-7049Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2013

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7049
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LAMATAVOUS REGTEZ COLLINS, a/k/a Red,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District
Judge. (1:10-cr-00466-MBS-3)
Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lamatavous Regtez Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley D.
Ragsdale, John David Rowell, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lamatavous Regtez Collins appeals the district court’s
order denying his second motion for a new trial and denying his
motion for the return of forfeited property. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although
we deny leave to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act, we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Collins, No. 1:10-cr-00466-MBS-3 (D.S.C. June 24, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.