United States of America v. Michael Owen Harriot, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a…

13-7022Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 4, 2013

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith,
a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D.
Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (3:99-cr-00341-SB-3)
Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Owen Harriot, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Harriot appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court denied the motion
because the Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 750 did not result
in a change to the Guidelines range. We have reviewed the
record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the material before this court and
argument will not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.