United States of America v. Harold Dwight Wooten

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6980
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
HAROLD DWIGHT WOOTEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:98-cr-00094-JAB-1)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 27, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold Dwight Wooten, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Harold Dwight Wooten appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Wooten relied on Sentencing
Guidelines Amendment 750 for his motion. The district court
denied relief because the Amendment did not result in a change
to Wooten’s Guidelines range. We have reviewed the record and
find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the material before this court and argument will
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --