The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6972•Louis Rychwalski, Jr. v. Lt Clayton; Co Miller; Co Collotta; Mrs. K. Green
13-6972Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 30, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6972
LOUIS RYCHWALSKI, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LT CLAYTON; CO# MILLER; CO# COLLOTTA; MRS. K. GREEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-02259-GLR)
Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louis Rychwalski, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith
Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Louis Rychwalski, Jr., appeals from the district
court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment
and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Rychwalski v. Clayton, No. 1:12-cv-02259-GLR
(D. Md. June 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.