The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6945•Ricky Gamble v. George Kenworthy
13-6945Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6945
RICKY GAMBLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEORGE KENWORTHY; WILLIAM BULLARD; OFFICER PORTER; STEVE
BRYAN; OFFICER MILLS; OFFICER HERRING; OFFICER BROWN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:12-ct-03010-D)
Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Gamble, Appellant Pro Se. Jodi Harrison, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Gamble appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) action against them. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Gamble’s
motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Gamble v. Kenworthy, No. 5:12-ct-
03010-D (E.D.N.C. May 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.