The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6933•United States of America v. Christopher Mitchell, a/k/a Hassan Jones, a/k/a Q Ili-Yaas Haakeem Farrakhan-Muhammad
13-6933Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6933
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, a/k/a Hassan Jones, a/k/a Q Ili-Yaas
Haakeem Farrakhan-Muhammad,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver,
Jr., District Judge. (2:90-cr-00020-2)
Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Steven
Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Candace Haley Bunn,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Mitchell appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 2:90-cr-
00020-2 (S.D.W. Va. May 22, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.