The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6904•Elbert Simpkins v. Sheriff Al Cannon
13-6904Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 30, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6904
ELBERT SIMPKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHERIFF AL CANNON; CAPTAIN KEYS; NFN RANDALL; LT JOHNSON,
classification dept; CO NFN LOVE; CO NFN VEGAS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (5:12-cv-01447-GRA)
Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elbert Simpkins, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel,
Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Elbert Simpkins appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny Simpkins’ motion for a transcript at government expense
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Simpkins v. Cannon, No. 5:12-cv-01447-GRA (D.S.C. May 28, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.