The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6883•John Frilando, a/k/a John Anthony Frilando, a/k/a John A. Frilando v. United States of America
13-6883Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6883
JOHN FRILANDO, a/k/a John Anthony Frilando, a/k/a John A.
Frilando,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JUDGE WESTON HOUCK; JUDGE CAMERON
CURRIE; JUDGE MARGARET B. SEYMOUR; AUSA ALFRED BETHEA; AGENT
JOSEPH M. KOEING; ATTORNEY RANDOLPH GREGORY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(4:13-cv-00861-DCN)
Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Frilando, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Frilando appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice Frilando’s civil complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Frilando v. United States, No. 4:13-cv-00861-DCN (D.S.C.
May 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.