The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6758•United States of America v. MARVIN WAYNE WILLIAMS, JR., a/k/a Lil Wayne
13-6758Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6758
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARVIN WAYNE WILLIAMS, JR., a/k/a Lil Wayne,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cr-00414-JCC-3)
Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marvin Wayne Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Phillip
Ben’Ary, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marvin Wayne Williams, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion
for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No.
1:09-cr-00414-JCC-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.