The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6747•United States of America v. Lorenzo Deshon Stephens
13-6747Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6747
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LORENZO DESHON STEPHENS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:06-cr-00281-HEH-1)
Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lorenzo Deshon Stephens, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles
Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo Deshon Stephens appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Our review of the record convinces
us that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
denying Stephens a reduction of sentence on the basis of public
safety. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Stephens, No. 3:06-cr-00281-
HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.