The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6704•Tony Lee Belton v. Dr Joel Sexton
13-6704Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6704
TONY LEE BELTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR JOEL SEXTON; DR JANICE ROSS; MARGARET HINDS, Esquire;
THOMAS SCOTT, III, Esquire, are all being sued in their
individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-00389-DCN)
Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tony Lee Belton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tony Lee Belton appeals the district court’s order
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action against Defendants after a 28
U.S.C. § 1915 (2006) review, and has filed a motion for
appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Belton’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment.
Belton v. Sexton, No. 1:13-cv-00389-DCN (D.S.C. filed Apr. 15,
2013; entered Apr. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.