The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6601•United States of America v. Joseph A. Hinton, a/k/a Bump
13-6601Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 25, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6601
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JOSEPH A. HINTON, a/k/a Bump,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:08-cr-00078-BO-1)
Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: June 25, 2014
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph A. Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Eric David Goulian, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph A. Hinton appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Hinton, No.
5:08-cr-00078-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.