The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6599•Randolph Copes v. DR. CLEM, Employee of CMS; P.A. JESSICA CECIL, Employee of CMS
13-6599Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 4, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6599
RANDOLPH COPES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. CLEM, Employee of CMS; P.A. JESSICA CECIL, Employee of
CMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:12-cv-00441-JFM)
Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randolph Copes, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia H. Beall, Michelle
Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY,
P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Randolph Copes appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Copes v. Clem, No. 1:12-cv-00441-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 13,
2013). We deny Copes’ motion for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.