The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6590•Scottie Lee Graves v. Mike Andrews; Julian Couch; Godwin Mensah; Patricia Butler
13-6590Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 4, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6590
SCOTTIE LEE GRAVES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MIKE ANDREWS; JULIAN COUCH; GODWIN MENSAH; PATRICIA BUTLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00154-JAB-JLW)
Submitted: August 26, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013
Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scottie Lee Graves, Appellant Pro Se. Marie Therese Inserra,
DURHAM COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Durham, North Carolina;
Jennifer Bryant Milak, Rebecca Ann Rausch, TEAGUE, CAMPBELL,
DENNIS & GORHAM, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Scottie Lee Graves appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Graves v. Andrews, No. 1:12-cv-00154-JAB-JLW (M.D.N.C.
Mar. 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.