The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6586•Gregory V. Smith v. P. E. SPIVEY, Jail Director, Individual
13-6586Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 8, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6586
GREGORY V. SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
P. E. SPIVEY, Jail Director, Individual and Official
capacity; CHRIS PHILLIPS, Detective, Individual and Official
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-00029-RBH)
Submitted: October 28, 2013 Decided: November 8, 2013
Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory V. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON
& LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory V. Smith appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s orders and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Smith v. Spivey, No. 1:12-cv-00029-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 27 &
Apr. 15, 2013). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel
and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.