The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6554•United States of America v. Michael Gilbert, a/k/a Tracy, a/k/a Roy Smith
13-6554Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 4, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6554
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL GILBERT, a/k/a Tracy, a/k/a Roy Smith,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:97-cr-00352-REP-2)
Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Gilbert, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Gilbert appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Gilbert, No. 3:97-cr-00352-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 20,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.