The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6553•Rayshawn Kalif Pearson v. Richard Turner; Bill Byars
13-6553Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 26, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6553
RAYSHAWN KALIF PEARSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD TURNER; BILL BYARS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(9:12-cv-01747-TMC)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rayshawn Kalif Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Ross Culbreath,
Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY,
PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rayshawn Kalif Pearson appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Pearson v. Turner, No. 9:12-cv-01747-TMC (D.S.C. Mar.
18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.