The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6528•John Clyde Britt, Jr. v. Matthew A. Raymes
13-6528Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6528
JOHN CLYDE BRITT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MATTHEW A. RAYMES; JEREMY HUGHES; MARCUS ANDERSON; GREG
MOORE; DAVID BORRESEN; BRIAN THOMPKINS; PAUL SPIEGLER,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOHN NEWLAND; CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:07-ct-03140-BO)
Submitted: August 20, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Clyde Britt, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe
Mitchell, THE MITCHELL LAW GROUP, Fayetteville, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
John Clyde Britt, Jr. appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Britt v. Raymes, No. 5:07-ct-03140-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar.
15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.