Arthur Rodgers v. Bobby Shearin

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6500
ARTHUR RODGERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOBBY SHEARIN; SERGEANT SIRES; OFFICER STEVENS; LIEUTENANT
WILT; OFFICER MALLOW; OFFICER RALEY; GREG FLURY, Physician’s
Assistant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-01585-CCB)
Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 23, 2013
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Michelle
Jacquelyn Marzullo, Richard P. Seitz, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN,
DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Rodgers appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and denying
relief on Rodgers’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Rodgers v. Shearin, No. 1:11-cv-01585-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 21,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --