Antonio Mosley v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department

13-6395Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2013

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6395
ANTONIO MOSLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; J. REDFERM,
Detective; JIM AGETRICK, Detective; TAMMY CLARY, Detective,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:13-cv-00070-RJC)
Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 29, 2013
Before MOTZ* and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Mosley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
* Judge Motz did not participate in consideration of this
case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Mosley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Mosley v.
Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Dep’t, No. 3:13-cv-00070-RJC
(W.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 2013). We deny Mosley’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.