The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6372•United States of America v. JAMES ISSAC COLE, JR., a/k/a Brother Cole
13-6372Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6372
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES ISSAC COLE, JR., a/k/a Brother Cole,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (0:07-cr-00316-JFA-1)
Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 29, 2013
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Issac Cole, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John David Rowell,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Issac Cole, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion
for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).
As we have recognized, however, a district court has no
authority to grant a motion to reconsider its previous order
denying a 3582(c) motion. United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d
233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.