The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6362•James Clinton Patterson, Jr. v. ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, FCC Petersburg
13-6362Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 5, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6362
JAMES CLINTON PATTERSON, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, FCC Petersburg,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00066-REP)
Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 5, 2013
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Clinton Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan
Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Clinton Patterson, Jr., a federal prisoner,
appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Wilson,
No. 3:12-cv-00066-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 8, 2013). We deny
Patterson’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.