The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6242•United States of America v. Rufus Houser, a/k/a Pookie
13-6242Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 28, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6242
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RUFUS HOUSER, a/k/a Pookie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:95-cr-00012-JPB-3)
Submitted: June 18, 2013 Decided: June 28, 2013
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rufus Houser, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rufus Houser appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for
reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Houser, No. 3:95-cr-
00012-JPB-3 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.