The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6183•Roy Beamon v. OFFICER CLARK, Pod Guard
13-6183Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 25, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6183
ROY BEAMON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER CLARK, Pod Guard,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00035-LMB-TRJ)
Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: June 25, 2013
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Beamon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roy Beamon appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Beamon v. Clark, No. 1:13-cv-00035-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va.
Jan. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.