The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-6172•Antrell Jermaine Fordham, a/k/a Antrell Fordham, a/k/a Antrell J. Fordham v. DR. MOORE; MRS. L. MAUNEY; MRS. E. HOLCOMB, individual and official capacities
13-6172Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6172
ANTRELL JERMAINE FORDHAM, a/k/a Antrell Fordham, a/k/a
Antrell J. Fordham,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. MOORE; MRS. L. MAUNEY; MRS. E. HOLCOMB, individual and
official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(2:12-cv-00974-MGL)
Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: April 30, 2013
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antrell Jermaine Fordham, Appellant Pro Se. Shelton Webber
Haile, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antrell Jermaine Fordham appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Fordham v. Moore, No. 2:12-cv-00974-MGL (D.S.C.
Jan. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.